No Royal Pain, No Financial Gain – 18th Mayonnaise 2021
The tropical article below is my longest article ever, and is probably the longest article I will ever write, because it must necessarily trawl through 1300 years of misery. Strap in.
So, Prince Harry, in a recent podcast, has criticised his upbringing. He said “there’s no blame, I don’t think we should be pointing the finger or blaming anybody” before going on to do just that: pointing the finger and blaming Prince Charles for being a bad father. But, as Harry says, it wasn’t really Charles’ fault. He was only a bad father because his parents, The Queen and the recently late HRH The Prince Philip, were, themselves, terrible parents ( having a name that includes the word ‘the’ in it seems to be an indicator of bad parenting skills). Harry says “there’s a lot of genetic pain and suffering that gets passed on…”. I shall stop Harry there because he witters on for over 4 hours. Instead, I wish to forensically investigate the cycle of royal pain* that has led to Harry’s pain (in the arse).
*technical note – there would be 2 to the power of 41, ie. 2199023255552 possible ways to follow Harry’s ancestry back (too many, even for this long article). I have chosen just one line, always going from child to parent (instead of following the standard list of the kings and queens and that, what you get in the history books). Eg. Elizabeth I is a world-famous monarch, but she didn’t have no babies so I’m not interested, because she couldn’t pass down no trauma through poor parenting. Also, Prince ‘Arry is a direct descendent of William the Conqueror, for example, but William the (as he was known informally to his friends) doesn’t feature in this list, because that’s one of the other 2199023255551 potential bloodlines I could have followed if I’d had time but didn’t.
So, we all know from the documentary The Crown that QUEEN ELIZABETH II was a cold and distant mother to Charles, but it wasn’t really her fault. She was a bad mother because of her upbringing, you see.
Her father, GEORGE VI, famously had a stammer that caused him to have a temper, causing him to lash out at his nearest and dearest, but that wasn’t his fault.
Because his father, GEORGE V, was a strong disciplinarian, who browbeat his son, causing him to have a stammer, but then…
EDWARD VII was renowned as a playboy prince and serial womaniser before he ascended the throne. What a terrible father he must have been to poor George. But that wasn’t his fault:
His mother, QUEEN VICTORIA, was a total misery after Prince Albert died and even blamed her son for his death. What a shocking mother! But then…
PRINCE EDWARD, DUKE OF KENT died when his daughter Victoria was 0 years old. Useless father!
GEORGE III was mad. No wonder his son Ed was a bad father.
FREDERICK, PRINCE OF WALES, died when George III was only 12. Not much better than that hopeless Edward, Duke of Kent. Must have scarred little George. But Fred didn’t have much of an upbringing himself.
His father, GEORGE II, left poor little Freddy behind in Germany when he came to England and didn’t bother to see him for 14 years.
GEORGE I married his first cousin, Sophia Dorothea of Celle. Is it wise to marry your first cousin? Anyway, it was a broken marriage. George had Sophie Dorothea imprisoned in a house in her native Celle (where the frig is that?) where she stayed until she died more than 30 years later. She was denied access to her children and father and forbidden to remarry. George I really was a ghastly husband and father. But then…
His mother, SOPHIA OF THE PALATINATE, ELECTRESS OF HANOVER, was probably too busy trying to work out what her titles even meant to be a decent mother, but then you can’t blame her.
Her mother, ELIZABETH STEWART, ELECTRESS OF THE PALATINATE AND QUEEN OF BOHEMIA (what?) had 16 children. I doubt she had much time for any of them.
Her father, JAMES VI OF SCOTLAND AND JAMES I OF ENGLAND AND IRELAND (that’s the same person, all right?!) was apparently too busy with his gay lovers, The Duke of Buckingham, The Duke of Lennox and The Earl of Somerset (separate people) [why couldn’t he just meet a normal man in a club like all the other gays?] to be a decent father. Mind you, he’d had a difficult childhood.
His mother, MARY, QUEEN OF SCOTS, abdicated, giving James the solemn duty and relentless hard work of being monarch…from the age of 13 months. So Mary wasn’t a perfect mother, but what about her upbringing?
Well, her father, JAMES V OF SCOTLAND, loved Mary to bits. He read her bedtime stories, played with her and generally doted on her until he died…when Mary was 6 days old. Hopeless!
His father, JAMES IV OF SCOTLAND, died when James Jr. was 1. Not much better.
But then his father, JAMES III OF SCOTLAND, married his wife when she was just 13. Shocker!
JAMES II OF SCOTLAND died in a slapstick cannon-based death when some ordinance he’d bought from Flanders exploded by mistake outside Roxburgh Castle. That must have been terribly traumatic for his 29-year-old son (James III, i.e. James Jr. Sr.)
JAMES (yes, another one!) I OF SCOTLAND was assassinated when his son was only 6. Not great.
His father, ROBERT III OF SCOTLAND, married Anabella Drummond when she was about 15. They had 7 children and he also had 2 illegitimate children. You can take it from me, he wasn’t a good daddy.
But not as bad as ROBERT II OF SCOTLAND, who had 26 children, including one called Robert, but that wasn’t Robert III – his real name was John.
His mother, MARJORIE BRUCE (no relation to popular Antiques Roadshow presenter Fiona Bruce), died the same year that Robert was born. Did she die in childbirth perhaps? No, she fell off a horse, aged 19-20. Hopeless!
Her father, ROBERT I THE BRUCE, was once attacked by an English knight. Rob smashed the knight’s skull in half with such force that he broke his axe. Afterwards he merely expressed regret that he had broken his favourite axe. A psychopath, and certainly no father.
Robert’s father was called ROBERT BRUCE, and Robert Bruce’s father was also called ROBERT BRUCE (distant relation to popular newsreader Fiona Bruce). Considering they couldn’t even be bothered to think of a new name for their children, I think we can be pretty confident they weren’t great dads.
Robert Bruce Sr. Sr. Sr.’s mother was ISABELLA HUNTINGDON, born in 1199. Little is known about her by historians, but you can take it from Harry, she was a bad mother. But…
Her father, DAVID OF HUNTINGDON, upon whom the legend of Robin Hood may be based, had 10 children, 3 of them illegitimate. Yet another dysfunctional father. But again, it wasn’t his fault, he was only passing on the genetic pain.
Dave’s father, HENRY OF HUNTINGDON, died on 12th June 1152, the same year that Dave was born. Historians don’t even know whether Henry died before or after his son was born, but safe to say, he wasn’t around much.
His father was DAVID I (a monarch – there were a few just there who weren’t. Did you notice? What a bore!) David is an official Catholic Saint, but was he really that saintly?
His mother was SAINT MARGARET OF SCOTLAND. Another one covering up her deficiencies under the cloak of sainthood.
Her daddy, EDWARD ATHLING was known as Edward the Exile. He spent most of his life in Hungary following the defeat of his father by King Cnut (spellchecker required/anagram checker encouraged). Eddie arrived back in England in 1057 with his wife and children but died within a few days. It was basically a long family holiday gone wrong.
EDMUND II IRONSIDE died the same year as his son, little Eddie the Exile Athling, was born. Another of those make-a-baby-then-drop-down-dead characters! Why did so many of these historical figures go to any length to avoid child maintenance?
His father was ETHELRED II THE UNREADY. Strictly speaking he wasn’t unready, but poorly advised. The word “unraed” means poorly advised in Ye Olde English (You Old English) and is a pun on Ethelred’s name, which means well-advised. That joke probably wasn’t even funny a thousand years ago. The point is, Ethelred must have been a cringe worthily embarrassing father with his Dark Ages dad jokes. “Ooh, I’m unraed and also Ethel-red. Get it?” “Shut up Dad!”
But what about Ethel’s father, EDGAR THE PEACEFUL, KING OF THE ENGLISH? Edgar heard of the great beauty of a lady called Ælfthryth so he sent his mate Æthelwald (we’re going so far back in the history of the royal genetic pain that we’re having to use letters of a long-obsolete alphabet now) to arrange marriage for him (Edgar) but Æthelwald, instead, married her himself. In retaliation, Edgar made sure that Æthelwald was killed in a hunting “accident” and then Edgar married her, as he had wanted. What Ælfthryth thought of all this is not known, but I think we can be reasonably confident that it was a dire marriage and they were bad parents to poor(ly advised) Ethel. Also, he called his son a name very close to the lad he killed. What a weirdo! Not his fault though…
EDMUND I THE ELDER died when his son Edgar was only about 2. He was murdered. More pain! He died aged just 24-25, so why was he called Edmund the Elder? Plus, he was also known as Edmund the Deed-doer, Edmund the Just, and Edmund the Magnificent. Clearly an inadequate man, like an impotent lothario in a flashy sports car.
Edmund’s father, EDWARD THE ELDER (ah, okay, that’s why Edmund was called the Elder then – fair enough) died when his son was about 2 (again!!). Pathetic! Why couldn’t they live long enough to be proper fathers? And my question still stands. Why the frig did they keep calling themselves the Elder? Anyway, I digress, I’m here to get to the root of Prince Harry’s pain, not talk about this.
His daddy, ALFRED THE GREAT, the legendary ruler and warrior king, born 848/9, died 26th October 899, King of the West Saxons 871-circa 886 and King of the Anglo-Saxons circa 886-899, father of England, brave, wise, noble and great monarch, man of extraordinary wealth, generosity and benevolence, bringer of all that is just, virtuous and good, suffered his whole life with haemorrhoids. Very disagreeable father.
His father, ÆTHELWULF, KING OF WESSEX, went on a pilgrimage to Rome in the 850s, when his son, lil Alfie the Great, was only 1 or 2. Not dissimilar to how Queen Elizabeth II left her young children when she took a trip out in the Commonwealth. You can see where she got it from.
His father, ECGBEORHT, KING OF WESSEX, was too busy spending his life fighting people with strange names like Beornwulf and Wiglaf, King of Mercia to be a decent dad. Plus, his name was the strangest of them all.
And finally, his dad was EALHMUND OF KENT (Prince Harry’s great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great grandad), who was King of Kent in 784 (King of Kent?! They did things a bit differently back then). We don’t know anything about Ealhmund. We know nothing about his life, nothing about his ancestry. This is as far back as it goes. But we can be pretty sure that Harry’s troubles started with him, or else one of his useless ancestors. But anyway, the point is, it wasn’t Harry’s fault. Nothing ever is.
A word about the future:
Harry has said he’s going to break the cycle of pain for his son, Archie, and impending daughter. But what about Prince William, Duke of Kate Middleton? Is he breaking the cycle of pain? Or is he just passing down all that anguish from 784 AD or earlier to little George, Charlotte and Louise.
The pain continues…